Showing posts with label BigLaw. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BigLaw. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Monday, September 12, 2016
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Thanks for the shout-out, Faculty Lounge and Bernie Burk!
We agree with Bernie Burk pretty much all of the time anyway (and not just because he's a friend), but it was extra nice to have our book mentioned in this post at The Faculty Lounge.
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Monday, July 21, 2014
Mark Herrmann is right (again).
See his latest post at Above the Law. You should assume that you need to prove yourself to others.
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
A tremendous (and illustrated) "alternative career" story from Above the Law.
Here. Hat tip to my buddy Kathleen Lyon. The lesson: if you don't like your life at a law firm, maybe you really should change careers.
Friday, May 30, 2014
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
Don't be the person known around the firm as someone who is trying to do a good job. Be the person who is actually doing a good job.
One of the best pieces of advice I ever heard was provided by Demetra Liggins, a partner at Thomson & Knight. She spoke to our law students about job success, and she explained that everyone is in charge of his or her own career. The best way to get ahead, she said, was not just to do a good job on your assignments but to think hard about how your assignments fit into the bigger picture--and offer to take on work that would move the entire project forward.
You will impress your boss(es) if you think about how what you're doing is going to be used by those higher up on the pecking order. If you make your work highly useful--and then see what else needs to be done--you will open up whole worlds of opportunities.
You will impress your boss(es) if you think about how what you're doing is going to be used by those higher up on the pecking order. If you make your work highly useful--and then see what else needs to be done--you will open up whole worlds of opportunities.
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
Appropriate attire depends very much on where you're working.
See this story from the ABA Journal about a firm that insists on classic work attire. Of course, the Great Pantyhose Debate probably will continue for a while, but here are my rules:
Appearing at the USSC: pantyhose.
Appearing before a circuit court or state supreme court: fishnets.
Appearing elsewhere: probably a pantsuit.
But that's just me.
Appearing at the USSC: pantyhose.
Appearing before a circuit court or state supreme court: fishnets.
Appearing elsewhere: probably a pantsuit.
But that's just me.
Saturday, January 18, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)